Journal Club » History » Version 30
Robert Suhada, 01/16/2013 01:36 PM
1 | 1 | Robert Suhada | h1. Journal Club |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 1 | Robert Suhada | |
3 | 20 | Robert Suhada | *Time:* Weekly - Friday, 14:00 - 15:30 |
4 | 17 | Robert Suhada | *Place:* Seminar room - I13 - upstairs |
5 | 2 | Robert Suhada | |
6 | 12 | Robert Suhada | |
7 | 12 | Robert Suhada | {{toc}} |
8 | 12 | Robert Suhada | |
9 | 2 | Robert Suhada | |
10 | 29 | Robert Suhada | h2. Next paper - *18.01.12* |
11 | 27 | Robert Suhada | |
12 | 30 | Robert Suhada | h2. The Formation of Massive Cluster Galaxies |
13 | 30 | Robert Suhada | |
14 | 30 | Robert Suhada | Conor L. Mancone, Anthony H. Gonzalez, Mark Brodwin, Spencer A. Stanford, Peter R. M. Eisenhardt, Daniel Stern, Christine Jones |
15 | 30 | Robert Suhada | (Submitted on 8 Jul 2010) |
16 | 30 | Robert Suhada | We present composite 3.6 and 4.5 micron luminosity functions for cluster galaxies measured from the Spitzer Deep, Wide-Field Survey (SDWFS) for 0.3<z<2. We compare the evolution of m* for these luminosity functions to models for passively evolving stellar populations to constrain the primary epoch of star formation in massive cluster galaxies. At low redshifts (z < 1.3) our results agree well with models with no mass assembly and passively evolving stellar populations with a luminosity-weighted mean formation redshift zf=2.4 assuming a Kroupa initial mass function (IMF). We conduct a thorough investigation of systematic biases that might influence our results, and estimate systematic uncertainites of Delta zf=(+0.16-0.18) (model normalization), Delta zf=(+0.40-0.05) (alpha), and Delta zf=(+0.30-0.45) (choice of stellar population model). For a Salpeter type IMF, the typical formation epoch is thus strongly constrained to be z ~2-3. Higher formation redshifts can only be made consistent with the data if one permits an evolving IMF that is bottom-light at high redshift, as suggested by van Dokkum et al 2008. At high redshift (z > 1.3) we also witness a statistically significant (>5sigma) disagreement between the measured luminosity function and the continuation of the passive evolution model from lower redshifts. After considering potential systematic biases that might influence our highest redshift data points, we interpret the observed deviation as potential evidence for ongoing mass assembly at this epoch. |
17 | 30 | Robert Suhada | |
18 | 30 | Robert Suhada | http://arXiv.org/abs/1007.1454v1 |
19 | 30 | Robert Suhada | |
20 | 30 | Robert Suhada | Votes: *1* |
21 | 5 | Robert Suhada | |
22 | 2 | Robert Suhada | h2. Paper pool |
23 | 7 | Robert Suhada | |
24 | 17 | Robert Suhada | !arrow-right.png! *[[paper_pool|Click here to add papers you'd like to discuss.]]* |
25 | 14 | Shantanu Desai | |
26 | 17 | Robert Suhada | !arrow-right.png! *[[paper_pool_2|Click here to add interesting papers that are too off-topic or controversial for the journal club.]]* |
27 | 11 | Robert Suhada | |
28 | 1 | Robert Suhada | h2. Video talks and lectures |
29 | 10 | Robert Suhada | |
30 | 17 | Robert Suhada | !arrow-right.png! *[[talks_pool|Click here to add links to talks or lectures you recommend.]]* |
31 | 17 | Robert Suhada | |
32 | 1 | Robert Suhada | h2. Previous papers |
33 | 18 | Robert Suhada | |
34 | 19 | Robert Suhada | !arrow-right.png! *[[jclub_history|Click here to see that papers we have already discussed.]]* |